I don’t speak Romanian, google translator is my friend and some knowledge of some base of Romance languages, these two makes me to understand Romanian text over 90% success. Unfortunately I am not able to write in a proper Romanian and for that I would not still use google translator since it is working poorly, I might be misunderstood.

dar de ce scrieti in limba engleza? nu ca as avea vreo problema cu limba (o cunosc bine), dar daca sunteti pe un site romanesc si vad ca citit bine in limba romana, de ce nu raspundeti in romana? e doar curiozitatea mea, nu vreau sa fac vreun apropo.

And what you would achieve with that? He’d just notice tha Ion Coja is a lunatic who does not have an ivory-tower-scholar knowledge of history….

let’s see the real truth behind your article and let’s reveal the horrible confusions, slips and distortions in this summary! Unfortunately, we can speak only about confusion in your head and the confusion of dreams is totally true for you and some Romanians!

First of all, “Greater Hungary” is an unofficial reference to the original Hungary and yes it has been existed with territorrial extent referred between 1000-1526, 1848-1849, 1867-1920. Of course it cannot be compared with “Greater Romania”, since the territorrial gains after WW1 cannot be compared ot a foundation of a country almost to a near millenia before. About this “Austrian redemption” we have to make clear they only helped in the very last time when Vienna was also endangered and before despite namely they were opposing the Turks, they did not make any sacrifice but the Hungarians to perish, even when the Hungarian Army won a battle the King despite made some treaties and gave up more territories to the enemy. This served the two-face policy of the Habsburgs to enweaken Hungary so they can conquer it easier later (finally they never managed). The rest is a typical Ion Coja type delusioning, although it is well-known Hungarians are the savior and defender of the European culture and opposingly your lunatic statements, Hungary was the only one who any time confronted the Turks and never compromised and managed to stop them. The rest of the “Christian” Europe only acted when they could not hide they cowardice and lack of interest and they were directly endangeoured. Shame on you Mr. Coja that you try to cheat history in such an awful way!

Transylvania was never a Romanain principality, after 1526 the Eastern side of Hungary transformed to the Eastern-Hungarian Kingdom and later Principality of Transylvania, that was a Hungarian state later on vassalage by the Habsburgs and partially on Turkish suzerainty. Formerly Principality of Wallachian and Moldavia was also not homogenous, including, Ruthenians, Bulgarians, and many Slavic nations, nevertheless, the Kings were also a long period of no Romanian origin, but they had Cuman or Turkic offspring.

Again, the Hungarian state did NOT disappear, just only were torn to three parts were two new Hungarian state emerged: Royal Hungary and Eastern Hungarian Kingdom, and your stupid conclusion is again a big lie, since before the two entities were not separate and of course Transylvania did not have the same history or model or political organization like the two Romanian principalities. Defamation is a thing that you are making without any serious historical knowledge! We have nothing to be ashamed of as much as you!

About “Magyarization” that is the favourite accusation of our deary neighbors we have to remember them is was only an option, it was not compulsory and mostly Jews lived with the opportunity, the heavy and forced Romanization of the Romanian state why you silenece where there was not even an option? Your level cannot be lowered comparing to us. You try to even to corrupt the Bolyai family, althoug in their correspondent time Hungarians were also living in the village that anyway was founded and named by Hungarians. So your call for the truth had come, Mr. History is here to correct your blatant mistakes!

In Hungary, Romanians are not persecuted, unless in Romania there are many unsolved problems. What you wrote about 1920 is again a bullshit. The Hungarian state was created in 1000. A. D., and it was a national state and also Hungarians were the majority. The ethnic composition changed after Hungarian Kings settled Saxons, Romanians and later after the wars that made a depopulation of the country they invited almost 14 natinalities to settle here, to say nothing of many refugees were accepted who fled to the safe Hungary against foreign threat. Anyway, before Trianon was still Hungarian the largest ethnic group.

Again you started delusioning. Hungary was always a sovereign country, entitiy with it’s own citizenship, Diet and legistlation also after 1526, having a Habsburg King did not mean any incopororation to the Austrian lands, since Hungary remained a separate country with all it’s institutions and borders, also before Hungary had many Kings of different houses, so missed again heavily, the conclusion is you don’t have an ivory-tower-scholar-knowledge of history. The idea of the Hungarian-Austrian-Romanian “Monarchy” was just one of the scenarios, but in reality Alexandru Vaida-Voeovod would better like “this Hungarian-Jewish state to coluntarily join to Romania”. Any comparison to Gypsies from Romania is heavily ridicoulus.

I cannot stop laughing on your next lines…uninterrupted continuity? Oldest? Romanian state? 600 years? You mixed heavily the pages and concepts, Mr…Romania was born in 1866, you have exactly now 150 years…if we count also the predecessor states (Wallachia, Moldavia) still you are not the oldest…so your contemplations about the historical truths, proper answer and other cries are totally trash, since you are the one who does not have even the minimal and necessary objectivity towards the facts, moreover, becoming more lunatic will not serve any good reason!

“The truth is most of the cases are in our side” :))) Yes we saw in this article “most of the cases” 🙂 Your Orthodox type of mentioning the God does not erase the heavy mistakes you committed. In 1918, in Gyulafehérvár/Alba Iulia you were coward and did not invite the representants of the other ethnics, and your promises did not kept. There is nothing really to celebrate because of this!